NewNew: The enterprise guide to Agentic AI — 24 min read.

Read →
Case study · Insurance · FinOps

Cutting LLM spend 41% at a Fortune 100 insurer

A Fortune 100 insurer had 40+ AI workloads across Azure and Bedrock with no unified cost view, no routing controls and a spend curve that was going to cross eight figures inside 18 months. pronix.ai stood up an LLM FinOps program that cut spend 41% with no measurable quality regression.

Client
Fortune 100 insurer, 40+ AI workloads
Industry
Insurance
Platform
Azure AI Foundry · Amazon Bedrock · Kore.ai
By pronix.ai FinOps Practice8 min readQ4 2025
-41%
Total LLM spend
0
Quality regressions on golden set
100%
Workloads with attributed cost
3 wk
Time to first defensible spend report

*Representative outcome; results vary by client, scope and platform configuration.

The challenge

AI spend had grown 6x in twelve months with no per-workload attribution, no routing policy and no monthly review. Finance couldn't defend the number. The CIO wanted a 30% cost reduction target without cutting workloads or degrading model quality.

Our approach

Step 01

Instrumented every request

Per-request token, latency, provider, workload, business unit and outcome tagging into a unified cost warehouse. Two weeks to instrument, one week to reconcile — and finance had a defensible number for the first time.

Step 02

Cheap-first cascade routing

Introduced a router that tried a cheaper model first, escalated on confidence or eval failure. Cached prompts on repeat contexts. Cascade caught 78% of traffic at 1/6th the unit cost.

Step 03

Monthly FinOps rhythm

A recurring 60-minute governance meeting with the CIO, CFO delegate and workload owners — actual spend vs guardrail, deltas explained, actions assigned. Boring on purpose.

Step 04

Guardrail budgets, not caps

Per-workload monthly budgets with alerting at 70% and 90%. Only two workloads ever tripped the alert — the visibility itself changed behavior.

For Head of FinOpsFor CIOFor Chief AI OfficerFor VP AI Platform

Illustrative case study. Scenarios, metrics, quotes and client details are representative composites based on Pronix engagements and industry benchmarks unless a named client is shown with written consent. Outcomes vary by client, scope, data quality and platform configuration. Nothing on this page is a guarantee, warranty or professional advice. See our Terms of Use for the full disclaimer.

Trademarks.

AWS, Salesforce, Microsoft, NICE, Genesys, Kore.ai, Google, ServiceNow, Amazon Connect and logos referenced on this site are trademarks of their respective owners. References are for descriptive purposes only and do not imply endorsement, sponsorship or partnership beyond stated partner relationships. See our Disclosures.

Bring this to your program

Talk to the team that shipped it.

Book a working session with a pronix.ai lead on this practice — we'll map the approach to your platform, industry and constraints.